- Details
- Written by Gordon Prentice
The Federal Government’s inaction on banning handguns and assault weapons is inexcusable.
Their timidity is deplorable.
The Minister in charge of the dithering, former Toronto police chief Bill Blair, says the Liberal election platform may include something on assault weapons. And while there will be no nationwide ban on handguns municipalities are likely to be given the powers to impose additional restrictions on handguns in their own patch. Seriously? Is this it?
Mass shootings now the new normal
Mass shootings have now become normalised in the dysfunctional United States. They happen all the time. In El Paso 22 people are murdered and 26 injured. In Dayton, 10 are slain and 27 injured. There are the usual thoughts and prayers but nothing will change down there.
If Sandy Hook Elementary School (27 killed); Las Vegas (58 killed, 422 wounded) and Orlando Night Club (49 killed, 53 wounded) couldn’t persuade Congress to act then nothing will.
The United States has shown itself to be incapable of addressing this epidemic of mass murder.
But why don’t we act to stop this madness from taking hold in Canada? Here there is no Second Amendment right to bear arms.
After Danforth what does it take?
A year ago we had Danforth where 3 people were killed and others left with life changing injuries. A young woman in the prime of life is left paralysed from the waist down. Who weeps for her?
Not the Federal Government. It is content to “consult” on the way forward. Ministers are afraid of offending the 2.1 million firearm licence holders in Canada. But what about the rest of us who don’t want or need guns?
The Government is strengthening gun laws (C72) but it is not enough.
The Government’s own figures show gun homicides have nearly doubled (98.5%) from 134 in 2013 to 266 in 2017.
More than half (55%) of firearm-related homicides in 2017 were committed using handguns.
Violent offences specific to firearms have increased by 45% since 2013, rising from 1,892 incidents in 2013 to 2,734 incidents in 2017.
And the spiralling incidence of gun crime shows no signs of levelling off.
Government relies on flawed survey results
The Government’s consultation in the wake of Danforth told us they had 135,00 responses to their on-line questionnaire.
But the survey was seriously flawed. Astonishingly, people could vote multiple times – and they did, invalidating the result.
But did Bill Blair comment on this? No.
It was no surprise that the key finding from the fraudulent online questionnaire was this:
“Majority of respondents did not support further limiting access to firearms and assault-style firearms”
Bill Blair gives weight to this tosh.
And resolves to keep us safe from gun violence.
How?
Gordon.prentice@shrinkslessorsquare
There are three categories of firearms in Canada: Restricted: handguns, certain rifles and semi-automatics; Prohibited: certain handguns, fully automatic rifles, and sawed off rifles; and Non-restricted: standard hunting rifles and shotguns.
Update on 8 August 2019 from the Toronto Star: Tougher gun measures on election agenda.
- Details
- Written by Gordon Prentice
Tony Van Bynen, the freshly minted 69 year old Liberal candidate for Newmarket-Aurora and our next MP, continues to block me from reading his Tweets.
I have tweeted the Liberal Party (@liberal_party) to ask if that’s OK and what’s going to happen when, in 12 weeks time, he is my MP.
Once he is comfortably settled in Ottawa will he respond to my emails on public policy issues or will he still block me?
If I want to talk to him about, say, a ban on handguns or the climate emergency or income inequality or any one of a thousand other issues will he silently ignore me?
Or will he engage with the argument?
Tony Van Bynen's Liberal Campaign Team tells us he needs volunteers
“to help with the crucial task of connecting with our voters at the door”.
I am left wondering if Tony will be knocking on my door to connect with me.
Tony needs YOUR HELP
In any event Tony is counting on YOUR HELP and you can join him at any or all of these fun events:
Saturday August 3rd 1.30-4pm. Meet at Talent Montessori School, 69 McLeod Dr, Aurora
Sunday August 4th 1.30-4pm. Meet at Sir William Mulock S.S, 705 Columbus Way, Newmarket
Tuesday August 6th 6.30-8.30pm. Meet at Devins Dr PS, 70 Devins Dr, Newmarket.
Thursday August 8th 6.30-8.30pm. Meet at Ray Twinney Arena, Newmarket.
Saturday August 10th 1.30-4pm. Meet at Newmarket Community Centre, 200 Doug Duncan Dr.
Sunday August 11th 1.30-4pm. Meet at Sir William Mulock S.S, 705 Columbus Way, Newmarket
Onwards and Upwards!
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Below: Tony wows his audience at his nominating meeting on 8 July 2019. Tony was the only candidate to throw his hat into the ring.
- Details
- Written by Gordon Prentice
Why on earth does the convicted fraudster Conrad Black want to return to the United Kingdom to reclaim his seat in the House of Lords?
Does he just like dressing up? Or has he got something to say?
Black has been on leave of absence from the House of Lords. To get back he needs to give the Clerk of the Parliaments three months notice that he intends to sit in the Lords again.
The BBC recently reported that Black was planning a return to the House of Lords for the first time since he was convicted in 2007.
“Lord Black said he had already planned to retake his seat after being released from prison but the presidential pardon “makes it easier”.”
The reporter points out:
“Your co-defendants convicted of the same crime (Richard Boultbee and Peter Atkinson) did not receive a pardon.”
And Conrad Black replies:
“But they haven’t asked for one… I don’t see why they don’t apply for one.”
Pardon me. Pardon them.
I suppose His Lordship could make a recommendation to Trump, to pardon them as Trump pardoned him.
Eric H. Sussman, who prosecuted Conrad Black, told readers of the Financial Post that the presidential pardon is a mockery of justice:
“The pardon lays bare the fact that justice in Donald Trump’s America is unapologetically linked to who you know and how much money you have.”
Sussman says he was saddened but not surprised that Trump decided to pardon Black for his theft of millions of dollars from public shareholders and obstruction of justice.
“Nothing betrays the mockery that President Trump has made of our justice system more than the fact the Black’s co-defendants, Richard Boultbee and Peter Atkinson, Canadians who were convicted by the same jury, at the same trial, of the same fraud crimes as Black, did not receive any pardon consideration from President Trump. They remain convicted federal criminals with no pop singers or right-wing pundits to vouch for them.”
In fact, Black did not go through the usual channels (ie the US Department of Justice) to apply for his pardon. He lobbied the White House directly through Alan Dershowitz, the Harvard law professor who is one of Trump’s staunchest defenders.
The Washington Post reported on 23 May that:
“Conrad Black (had) enlisted one of Trump’s biggest on-air defenders, Alan Dershowitz, to get the president’s attention.”
And it worked.
Black has refused to send me the Report from the White House Counsel’s Office which allegedly persuaded Trump to issue his pardon. So I asked the Office of the Pardon Attorney for a copy. They tell me:
“We have received your correspondence requesting a copy of a report alleged to have been created by the Office of White House Counsel related to Conrad Moffat Black, who was granted a Presidential pardon on May 15, 2019.”
“Please be advised that Mr. Black did not submit a pardon petition through the Department of Justice (the Department), so we are unaware of and cannot confirm or deny the existence of the records used by the President to make the above-referenced clemency decision.”
Black's contributions in the House of Lords
Black joined the Lords on 31 October 2001.
In his maiden speech on 15 May 2002 Baron Black told his fellow peers:
“My Lords, it is a privilege to be here. After the tortuous course that I pursued getting to your Lordships’ House I would be remiss if I did not thank the former Leader of the Opposition and the Prime Minister for their kind persistence on my behalf…”
Next up is Viscount Slim who says it is a great privilege to hear from Lord Black:
“We hope to see him here often. I congratulate him on a marvellous maiden speech.”
We hope to see him here often!
In all his many years as a member of the House of Lords Conrad Black has spoken twice. (The second occasion was on Iraq on 28 November 2002.)
Isn’t it an impertinence to allow someone like Black, a convicted fraudster, to be part of the UK’s legislature, making the laws for everyone else?
Criminal Record not "expunged" by Trump's pardon
To be clear, Black’s criminal record is not expunged by Trump’s pardon. Only a Court of Law can expunge a criminal conviction.
New rules set out in the Standing Orders of the House of Lords, agreed in 2015, make provision for the expulsion or suspension of a member but these are not retrospective. He is a peer for life and has been registered to sit as a cross-bencher (or independent) since the Conservative whip was withdrawn in 2007 on his imprisonment.
In the House of Commons the rules are different. A jail sentence of a year or more for an MP means automatic expulsion.
Despite everything Lord Black of Crossharbour retains his title and his privileges and his trade-mark braggadocio.
When he eventually stirs himself and returns to the House of Lords I am left wondering what his third speech will be all about.
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Black renounced his Canadian citizenship in 2001 to get into the House of Lords. On his release from prison in the United States in 2012 he was allowed into Canada on a temporary residence basis. He is still here.
- Details
- Written by Gordon Prentice
Central Moscow is in turmoil as thousands of protesters take to the streets to demand fair elections to the City Council on 8 September 2019.
Over 1,300 people were detained by police over the weekend with reports of protesters being brutally clubbed and manhandled.
The protesters say the election authorities are refusing to register candidates they don’t want to see on the City Council, inventing reasons to keep them off the ballot paper. We are told disqualified candidates submitted forms that contained errors or fraudulent signatures.
The demonstrations are happening just days after I return home from Russia. In Moscow I saw little groups of flag waving protesters but nothing on the scale now being reported. Otherwise I would have joined in to learn more about the issues.
Heavy police presence
There is a heavy police and security presence in central Moscow but I figure this is just normal.
The Western tourists I speak to marvel at the prosperity and freedom of today’s Russia, at least in the big tourist destinations. They and their tourist guides openly crack jokes about the KGB and the old surveillance state when everyone was frightened to say boo! to a goose. Things are different now, they say.
A bronze dog in the Hermitage Museum in St Petersburg – pointed out to us as we file by - is the spitting image of Vladimir Putin. We all chortle. Then gales of laughter. What fun!
The huge GUM store on Red Square – once the shopping destination of choice for the Soviet Union’s nomenklatura offering goods that couldn’t be found anywhere else – is now full of high-end fashion outlets and very expensive international brands.
But behind the glitz there is a different reality.
Assassination a stone's throw from the Kremlin
One morning as I am walking over Stalin’s bridge to Red Square I come across two women, perched on little stools, in front of flowers and photographs of Boris Nemtsov, a Russian politician and an outspoken critic of Vladimir Putin whom he believed to be deeply corrupt.
Nemtsov was assassinated on 27 February 2015 on this very bridge, a five-minute stroll from Red Square. As tourists wander past, unaware of that brutal killing four years ago, I ask the women how long they’ve been there and what the authorities think about the protest. I learn there are about 60 of them who take it in turns to keep the protest going. They’ve been there every day since Nemtsov was shot dead with four bullets in the back.
They want those responsible to be tracked down and brought to justice and for a memorial to be erected on the spot where Nemtsov was slain. Personally, I can’t see it happening.
In the early days, they tell me the authorities were very hostile to the protest but the women are now largely left alone. Sometimes men in boots appear and throw the flowers over the bridge parapet. When I ask for a leaflet explaining more about the protest, the women shake their heads (there are no leaflets) but one gives me the lapel badge she is wearing.
Now I am reading about an opposition politician Alexei Navalny who has been hospitalised as
“the result of harmful effects of undefined chemical substances”.
Radioactive relationships
We all know about polonium but I wonder what else is in the cupboard?
The former UK Prime Minister, Theresa May, reportedly told Putin in a private meeting at the G20 summit in Osaka last month that, in relation to the Salisbury poisoning, there was:
“irrefutable evidence that Russia was behind the attack – based on painstaking investigations and cooperation with our allies”
Russia, of course, denies this.
Russia Today just reports the news as they see it.
In the same way, the assassinated Boris Nemtsov and the four year vigil on the bridge is not news and is therefore not reported.
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The Soviet Union collapsed on 26 December 1991.
Update on 31 July 2019 from the Globe and Mail: The Kremlin lashes out, but Russians are no longer afraid to fight back.
Update on 3 August 2019 from the Guardian: Opposition leader detained. And more here.
Update on 4 August 2019 from the Observer on the police crackdown.
Update on 11 February 2020: From the Guardian. Prague Square - home to the Russian Embassy - is named after Boris Nemtsov.
- Details
- Written by Gordon Prentice
The oldest tree in Newmarket is in the back yard of a house at 438 Botsford Street but it may not be with us much longer.
The old White Oak was designated as a heritage tree in 2005 and is at least 214 years old, possibly as much as 314 years old. It is huge.
Think about it. Astonishingly, it was there during the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805.
And the old tree was standing during the Rebellion of 1837. It is a fabled part of our Town’s history.
438 Botsford Street (or Liberty Hall) was the home of James B. Caldwell, a rebel sympathiser. The tree became known as Liberty Tree.
"They paved paradise and put up a parking lot"
It sits smack bang up against the property line with a neighbouring house on Timothy Street whose owners, despite the tree’s heritage designation, paved over the entire back yard to provide additional parking for their new apartment building. About 35% of the tree’s root system is buried under 8 inches of impervious asphalt.
As a result, the old tree could be starved of the vital nutrients it needs. It doesn’t get the constant drip of nourishing rainwater. And construction of the Timothy Street building saw huge piles of earth being heaped on top of the tree’s root system by heavy construction equipment. Fifty per cent of a tree’s root system is in the top one foot of soil and 90% is in the top three feet. Heavy machinery can do real damage but it is hidden and can take years to manifest. For the moment, the tree looks good for its great age but that could change overnight.
"It's a piece of our history"
Victor Woodhouse was on the Council back in 2007 when the Council was considering making a $750 grant “to invest in the well-being of the tree”. At the time he said:
“It is the only designated tree in Town. This is a piece of our history. It’s too bad it’s not more visible to the public so everyone could enjoy it.”
So, what needs to be done? The Town should immediately commission an expert arborist to check the tree for signs of distress and to report on its overall condition. If the paving has to be dug up to save the tree then that should happen. No question.
But how was it possible for the Liberty Tree’s root system to be paved over, apparently without a second thought?
Who is policing the Town’s designated heritage properties and its other features of historic value?
Trees need us
The Town is currently looking at its policies on trees and not before time. For years, developers have been buying up and clear-cutting building lots before putting in applications to the Town to demolish old houses and redeveloping with much bigger ones. Profit is the priority and trees get in the way.
That mind-set needs to change. Trees need us. And we need them.
What a terrible indictment of the Town of Newmarket and its stewardship if, by inaction, indifference or neglect, it allows the old Liberty Tree to wither and die, its roots suffocating under a parking lot.
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Update on 16 August 2019: And here is how Newmarket Today covered the story.
Page 108 of 273